| [#736] | project: scala-doc | priority: medium | category: bug | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| submitter | assigned to | status | date submitted | |
| Burak | Sean | moved to trac | 2006-09-09 14:39:40.0 | |
| subject | var definitions | |||
| code |
package pack
/** hello */
abstract class Foo {
/** hola */
var x:Int
}
/** hello */
class Bar extends Foo {
/** hola */
override var x = 3
} |
|||
| what happened | documentation for Foo:x shows the setter and getter methods, and does not indicate that "there is an abstract va\ rdef" |
|||
| what expected | I would expect "abstract var x:Int" in documentation of Foo, and "var x" in definition of Bar. | |||
| [back to overview] | ||||
| Sean edited on 2006-09-09 16:34:25.0 |
| I think NSC is doing some early transformations before or during type checking is completed that blow away all of this information. Vars never really exist, and we can't piece them back together very easily in Scaladoc. |
| Martin edited on 2006-09-19 19:40:42.0 |
| nsc now marks setters and getters of abstract fields with the ABSTRACT flag. What's more, isSetter and isGetter (in Symbols.scala) now return true for such members. So, back to you, Sean... |
| Gilles edited on 2007-08-29 10:58:35.0 |